Instead we are focusing on how the musical texture is changed by simplifying the arrangement for acoustic guitar and one singer – removing the bass, drums, and other accompanying musical elements (such as harmonies) in the process.īy understanding the different types of texture in music, you can enhance your music’s emotional impact on the listener and create arrangements that take people on a sonic journey. For the sake of this article, we’re not focusing on how the singer’s voice sounds different from Bono’s. You are essentially hearing the same musical work both times, but the texture has been vastly altered. Just like we may describe the texture of a surface as smooth, rough, or sticky, musical texture can be described as the way music “feels” influencing the impression it has on us.Ĭonsider two different arrangements of the same song, such as an anthemic U2 hit vs a stripped-down acoustic cover of the same song. What is Musical Texture?įirstly, this is separate from sonic texture (think warm tube amps and tape sims), but musical and sonic textures draw from similar ideas. The most important step towards making the kind of arrangements you hear in popular music is to gain an understanding of musical texture. It took me years to figure this out, and I’d like to help you get there sooner. If you struggle with creating dynamic arrangements, you’re not alone. There’s either too little or too much going on, and the songs don’t feel like they’ve taken you on a journey either way. See chapter 1, Fundamental Musical Concepts and Forms, "Texture.One of the biggest things I see beginner producers struggle with is creating a full, dynamic arrangement. I referenced the textbook Music Then and Now by Thomas Forrest Kelly to ensure the accuracy of my answer. If this does not answer your question, please be more specific. This question is categorized as "physics" but I am unsure which sort of physical explanation might be sought after specifically in terms of musical textures. You may compare and contrast these explanations to answer your question. A singer and a guitar, for example, are not exactly homophonic, but close. Note that most pieces are not all one texture or another. An example is the section in the "Hallelujah" chorus where the choir sings "And he shall reign for ever and ever." Additionally, Pachelbel's Canon is polyphonic. A good example is the moment in the "Hallelujah" chorus where the chorus sings a series of "Hallelujahs" in the same rhythm.Ī polyphonic texture refers to a web of autonomous melodies, each of which contributes to the texture and the harmony of the piece but is a separate and independent strand in the fabric, so to speak. Homophonic music has one clear melodic line, the part that draws your attention, and all other parts provide accompaniment. An example of monophony is one person whistling a tune, or a more musical example is the clarinet solo that forms the third movement of Messiaen's Quartet for the End of Time.Ī homophonic texture refers to music where there are many notes at once, but all moving in the same rhythm. We refer to these overall effects as texture.Ī monophonic texture refers to music with a single melodic line (no harmony or counterpoint) sounding the same thing at the same time-whether played or sung, performed on a single instrument or by a voice or voices and instruments playing in unison. More often we might have several different instruments playing together, each with its bit of melody, or a song that has a chordal accompaniment on piano. Most of the music we listen to consists of more than a single melodic line.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |